I do not have short arms. In fact I’ve always thought them a little long if anything; average at the very least.
Yet every suit I buy has arms that are an inch too long. Surely the rest of the male population with a 40-inch chest can’t have arms that are that much longer?
The truth is, they don’t. Suits are just manufactured with longer arms than average because few men notice that their sleeves are too long. They’d notice if they were too short, as there would be a startling excess of cuff. But an inch or two too long goes unnoticed.
It’s the same with a jacket’s waist. Every off-the-peg jacket is made with a waist that is far bigger than the average for a man of that chest size. Because many thin men don’t notice that it’s too big about the waist. They don’t even do the jacket up most of the time. Yet fat men notice when the waist is too small. The physical discomfort ensures it.
Now I can just buy a 40 short, when the retailer offers it. The jacket will be shorter as well, but I generally prefer that style anyway. But if my arms are longer than average and I’m on the 40 short, what does everyone do that has shorter arms?
They don’t do anything. They let their sleeves be too long and as a result lose one of the joys of formal dressing – that colour combination that occurs at the end of the arm where cuff peeks out of jacket sleeve. If the sleeves are the correct length (shirt stopping at the base of the thumb, jacket at the wrist bone – when arms are at your side) there is a lovely dash of colour at the end of the arm that serves to flatter and highlight its length. It is one of the style loci (see previous post).
A sleeve that is one inch longer than it should be is just enough to cover the shirt cuff, but not enough to look wrong to the untrained eye. So men do not have it altered.
They should do. It is cheap to change, probably around £15 to £20 depending on your tailor – and assuming the jacket does not have working buttonholes. If it doesn’t have buttonholes the tailor can shorten the arm and move one button from the bottom to the top of the row. If it does, the shortening has to be done from the shoulder, with the whole sleeve being unsewn from the main body, shortened and reattached. That will be more like £35 to £40.
If you can change it cheaply, do. It’s another one of those little things that makes a big difference to how an outfit looks.








4 Guest Comments »
ReplyDelete1.
I almost fell for the suit until I saw the man’s hideous legto (tatto). Hmm…
Charles Bixx
http://hbemis.wordpress.com/
Comment by Charles Bixx — August 11, 2008 #
2.
Charles,
I agree with you, that picture ruins the entire image for me as well. As I mentioned in a previous commentary, this is a good example of it, how small issues (in this case that hideous leg graphic) can ruin the greater impact of a man’s overall presentation.
Nicola
Comment by Nicola Linza — August 12, 2008 #
3.
Simon,
The article is terrific. I would however have chosen a different picture for the top as the one shown does nothing for the piece, but distract and degrade it.
Nicola
Comment by Nicola Linza — August 12, 2008 #
4.
He has a tattoo. Big deal. He looks great has style and cuffs are perfect which is the point of the picture.
Comment by Kai — August 12, 2008 #
Simon - I have noticed the same thing but from the other end of the scale. I have a 40 inch chest but am 6'5" and have the long arms which come with being tall. However even a 40 regular suit will fit nicely, without the arms being too long. If I take a 40 long the body will be a little longer, which is great, but the arms are then too long and need shortening. Only twice have I ever had the arms of a suit or jacket lengthened.
ReplyDeleteSlimness is another matter and in my experience depends on the manufacturer as much as anything. Paul Smith and Burberry, for example, give a great slim cut whereas Hugo Boss (again just an example) suits are cut much wider and are less elegant as a result.
Interesting to hear William. If a 40 regular fits the arms of someone who is 6'5'' then this backs up my impression. People are getting taller but 6'5'' isn't quite regular yet!
ReplyDeleteWhat's your feeling on wearing polo shirts with jackets? If the jacket sleeves are the right length for wearing with a long sleeved shirt (i.e. the length you describe) then wearing them with a short sleeve polo shirt risks a look where your jacket sleeves are too short.
ReplyDeleteCaldervale,
ReplyDeleteI think that's inevitable but should not dissuade you from polo shirts with jackets. The jacket material is key - it needs to be casual and rougher than worsted. The polo shirt, also, should be clean and crisp, in a plain, smart colour. I recommend cream - like white but without the tennis connotations.
Simon
So true. I did shorten already two sleeves. Thanks for the advice! (and spread the word)
ReplyDeleteSuits with no visible shirt sleeve look just wrong.
If you can see the sleeve ever so slightly beyond the the Jacket it looks fine, smart and under controll. If not you have wasted the money you spent both on the Jacket and shirt, you are a crash. As if a woman bought a nice dress only to see, parts of a bra or slip too low, everything ruined, money wasted. Keep your look crisp and clean. Watch out for that lipstick on a pig.
ReplyDelete@andreas, exactly! I just bought a suit, it fits well but it barely shows my shirt sleeves (actually it does'nt show them at all) time to alter it.
ReplyDelete