But then they can’t see their suit trousers piled up on the rubber nubbins that driving shoes often have on their heels. To those walking behind them, it looks just as bad as wearing chunky trainers with a suit.
Driving shoes and worsted wool (the smooth wool of most suits) are just too far apart on the formality scale. This is why they look wrong together; why suddenly the shoes make suit trousers look flimsy and insubstantial, a little like pyjamas.
Here is my approximation of the sliding scale of formality:
Shoes Trousers
Wholecut Oxfords - Worsted wool
Toecap Oxfords (quarter brogues) - Worsted wool/linen or cotton
Monk-front shoes - Worsted wool
Half-brogues - Worsted wool/linen or cotton
Derbys (Bluchers) - Flannel/worsted/cords or khakis
Smart slip-ons (Norwegian split-toe) - Worsted/cords or khakis
Full brogues (wingtips) - Flannel/cords
Suede/Nubuck - Anything but worsted
Deck shoes - Cords or khakis/jeans
Driving shoes - Khakis/jeans
[Notes: This list does not include boots, extending above the ankle makes any of these types a notch more casual; neither does it include shorts, as I think they can look good with anything but the top three types of shoe; double soles also make any of these a notch more casual, particularly monk-fronts; patent leather should be reserved for formalwear; cotton is the most versatile material and can be hard to pin down, as jeans can go with all but a few of these shoes, as can khakis arguably.]
These, to me, are the types of shoe (beginning with the most formal and ending at the bottom with the most casual) that most suit a material of trouser.
The more formal and elegant a piece of clothing the more delicate its materials and textures are likely to be. Worsted wool needs shoes with sleek shapes, slim soles and clean designs. Heavier wools need heavier shapes, most obviously flannel with brogues. The rough seams and rubber ridges of driving shoes are more suited to jeans or more casual trousers.
Within this range, combinations can work by going up or down one notch, possibly even two. But the problem of wearing driving shoes with worsted is demonstrated – the two are just too far apart.








4 Guest Comments »
ReplyDelete1.
Aren’t “Full brogues (wingtips)” more formal than “Smart slip-ons (Norwegian split-toe)”?
Comment by Kai — July 25, 2008 #
2.
So it seems that in terms of ‘practical dressing,’ one might very well build a wardrobe around bluchers as they offer the greatest flexibility up and down the scale.
And actually I’d go even further: I’ve seen bluchers with jeans and they looked great.
Comment by David — July 25, 2008 #
Kai - I would argue that the two are very close, and that full brogues would probably be considered by many to be smarter. However, when it comes to matching textures with trousers, the heavier brogueing of a wing-tip to me is more important.
ReplyDeleteDavid - I agree, bluchers are probably the most flexible style there is. They can definitely look good with jeans. Half-brogues are probably the closest rival, though they are harder to pull off with jeans.
Simon
Sadly, those blasted driving shoes have been all over Italy for several years... And many Italian men wear them (though they tend to be younger). They just look stupid with a suit, and you're absolutely right when you say it ruins the suit by making it look like a pajama.
ReplyDeleteGuess folks in London got around to copying the look.
IMHO, for all the fame of Italian dress and style, shoes have never really been a strength. We have never really produced a classic style and a quality product on market scale. Some hand-mades are okay, but American and British shoes are the "go to" shoe for a man and his permanent style.
Yes, the Gucci loafer with the metal clasp has a place, but the weejun and its brethren are far superior and less affected. So why bother with the Gucci, or Todd's?
Initials CG -
ReplyDeleteEssentially, the problem with the driving shoe is the sole. I wouldn't have a problem with any upper being worn with a suit necessarily, but those rubber soles, particularly on the heel, just don't match up. Perhaps some of the driving-shoe manufacturers should offer each style in both a rubber and leather sole?
I agree on the less-affected Weejun as well.
Simon
I think the reason the Italians "get away with it" is the cut of their trousers. They are tailored higher than we wear ours and are often far slimmer and more tapered; so, no puddling on top of the shoe or catching on the nubs at the back.
ReplyDeleteI think it can work -- just not for everyone. And I'd far prefer to see them worn with an odd jacket and trousers.
Good point, EAEL, the cut of the trousers is just as important as the material they are made from.
ReplyDeleteWhile the heavier material of cotton trousers will puddle less on the rubber, the cut will also keep them further from the rubber in the first place.