A few months ago I began a process with Charlie Collingwood, a visiting tailor that had just set up his own business called Henry Herbert. He had initially taught himself to make shirts but, following a stint shadowing a few East End tailors, began cutting suits as well.
Charlie offered to make me a suit in order to review the service. I opted for a mid-grey pick-and-pick super-140s merino wool with a bronze-coloured lining, to make a three-piece single-breasted suit.
At the first fitting I was impressed with the cut of the trousers, which followed the curve of the small of my back very well. This enables them to stay higher up the waist without slipping down and without braces.
The seat was rather tight so I asked for that to be altered. I also asked for the jacket to be shortened – and for this to be taken from the top rather than the bottom as the waist button was already rather low. And I asked for the waistcoat to be cut lower, as four buttons were showing from under the jacket.
At the second fitting the seat seemed a little better, but still tight. The waistcoat looked the same. And I swear the jacket had been shortened from the bottom, though Charlie said this was not the case. I may have been mistaken.
The waistcoat had to be remade, which Charlie agreed to do. This was generous, for the cloth was not cheap. But while it seemed to be an improvement at first glance, and the lapels were cut lower, the fit elsewhere was a little lacking. It stood about half an inch away from my shirt collar and was big at the sides.
The jacket is fine, though there is some tightness across the top of the sleeve. The cloth, I should say, is absolutely lovely and the lining goes very well.
Looking back on the fitting process, it was noticeable that 90% of the comments made about the suit were by me, at Charlie’s inquiry. Chalkings spurred by his own observations were fewer.
Charlie says he cuts the cloth himself, but the suit was made at a CMT (cut, make and trim) house in northern England. There’s nothing necessarily wrong with a CMT house – some good tailors offer a CMT service themselves. And most houses offer a big range of construction options. Indeed, the new waistcoat from Charlie had a ticket in the pocket with the ‘hand stitching’ option ticked.
I think this, however, referred to the decorative stitching on the lapels, which was done by machine for effect. And there is little handwork elsewhere. The lining is all attached by machine, the buttonholes done by machine and the sleeves attached similarly. Short of taking the jacket apart, there is no evidence of handwork that I can see. The canvas of the chest is floating, not fused, but appears to be attached by wonder webbing rather than hand stitches.
In the end, there’s nothing wrong with a travelling tailor and there are two very distinct aspects to his service – the quality of the construction he gets from his outsourced tailors and his ability to communicate the figuration to them. Though of course it makes the whole thing easier if this is all done in the same building.
Charlie’s prices run from £600 to £1400, starting at super 70s and adding roughly £100 for every extra ‘super 10’.
www.henryherbert.com





I get an impression of disappointment. Am I far off the mark?
ReplyDeleteI think he's going to be as pleased with your review as you are with his suit, but I doubt his suit will cost you customers.
ReplyDeleteSo the actual suit costs £600 less cloth. The additional cost is down to the cloth. The suit doesn't fit and it's made cheap.
ReplyDeleteWhy would anyone pay premium prices for the only thing the 'tailor' doesn't make - namely the cloth? And why is such huge money (£1300 on your account for a 140s) being paid to a man whose expertise lies in having 'shadowed a few east end tailors'? For that price you could get the real thing cut by someone who knows and in a cloth that would last more than a year and still look good after a hard day at work - which your 140 won't.
Blimey - I live near Bateman and Ogden, where you can get fantastic super numbers suit lengths for about a hundered quid
ReplyDeleteI think it's a real shame that you have to be critical in a blog like this, and that something could obviously cost the tailor business. But it is a service nonetheless and I wouldn't want opinions anaesthetised. A difficult balance.
ReplyDeleteGary
Why shouldn't Simon post this on his blog? It sounds sincere and so it should be told.
ReplyDeleteSeems to me like a very fair and balanced review. It seems the tailor specifically asked Simon for a review, so he can hardly be surprised when that is what he gets. Simon would be doing his readers a diservice is he was less than honest about the results.
ReplyDeleteA few clarifications following questions put to me:
ReplyDelete- Charlie was told he could inform me of any errors of fact and they would be changed immediately. I haven't received any such requests, though Charlie may post a reply here soon.
- The only comment on this post I have blocked was one referring to me as an 'A1 shit', which hardly seemed constructive.
- I did not imply that Charlie was lying about how the jacket height was altered. Merely that it seemed to me the adjustment had not been made that way, but I honestly couldn't say for sure.
Well, as to Charlie's first hand knowledge of the length alteration -- Charlie posted a photo on his own blog, claiming it was from Henry Herbert's recent visit to Florence, when in reality it was from the Sartorialist (circa 2005). So I wouldn't assume anything about a cut, make and trim factory suit that advertises itself as bespoke.
ReplyDeleteDo you feel it is fair to the tailor or your readers to provide critical comments that cannot be observed on the given item?
ReplyDeleteI notice that you normally illustrate the items tailors have given you on yourself during a review. This suit in question, that you outline various issues with is showing as a single shot not on your person. As such, one may not determine if the issues you point are actually valid.
I think if that's how much you value my opinions, you shouldn't really be reading this blog.
ReplyDelete