![]() |
| Incotex trousers |
Dear Simon,
I have a couple of questions on trousers
which I haven’t seen you address. First, you said in a post a while ago that side
straps should be positioned on the waistband seam, not the waistband itself, to
make it more comfortable and add an extra inch to the rise. But on my suit
trousers made by Graham Browne the straps sit on the waistband. If you say they
are better that way then why are the tailors not making them up like this? And how
does it make it more comfortable to wear?
I would also like to extend my trouser
selection and was thinking of chinos, something you mentioned recently in a
post, saying that a cream and faun and olive green are best to go for. What is
the best weight cloth, as I would like to have these made by Graham Browne if
they do them? The idea behind these is to have some weekend trousers that are
not too formal but that I can wear with light jackets, cardigans, heavier
jackets both in the summer and the winter. Further, is cotton and gabardine
(like that lovely gabardine suit you had made at Choppin and Lodge) the same
thing and if these are made up by Russell would they be machine washable?
Bradley
-
Hi Bradley,
You’ve certainly been thinking this through.
Hopefully your questions should be quite easy to answer though.
First, the side straps. Having them on the
waistband, the seam or even below the band is largely a personal preference.
All my Anderson & Sheppard suits, for example, have the strap on the seam
and this is where I first encountered it. But others from Henry Poole,
Cifonelli and Timothy Everest have them on the waistband, so Graham Browne is
not alone. Most will change the position if you request it.
Although I do find it slightly more
comfortable, the biggest reason to have it on the seam, for me, is the extra
rise. I dislike wearing trousers on my natural waist, but I am painfully aware
of its advantages in terms of hiding shirt cloth below the buttoning point of a
jacket, and hiding the same when wearing a waistcoat. This strap position does
not solve the problem, but does add about an inch of coverage.
On chinos, I would go ready to wear, to be
honest. I have had chino-type trousers made by half a dozen tailors and not
really liked any of them. The cloths and make mean they are never as casual as
you envision. It’s painful to have to sort through all the different fits, but
it’s worth it. My favourite is Incotex (regular leg style – it has a higher
rise). Unfortunately the new Slowear store on South Molton Street in London
only stocks slim and skinny fits, but Trunk normally has a decent selection of
regulars.
By all means have smarter trousers made by
a tailor. I would recommend corduroy, moleskin, (wool) gabardine and even a heavy
drill cotton. Cotton gabardine, which was what the Choppin & Lodge suit was
made from, I don’t think works as well as an odd trouser. And no, do not mashine-wash
them.
Best
Simon









Bradley and Simon, for what it is worth, I've tried both ready to wear chinos and made to measure and agree with Simon. It takes time (and trial and error) to find the fit One brand I found and suggest worth the effort is Ring Jacket from Japan. Great for those of us no longer 20 something and still wanting to look smart. I get them from the Armoury in Hong Kong - they'll do mail order - and adjustments in London James
ReplyDelete