The third in this series on bespoke shirts,
this post looks at the made-to-measure service offered by Segun Adelaja, who
owns a boutique in the Prince’s Arcade.
It is obviously not a direct comparison to
either Burgos or Satriano Cinque, as it is not bespoke and not cut by hand.
However, as the price is £240 for a shirt, it is actually more expensive,
reflecting the costs of having a shop in London and the cost savings of not
having to travel abroad.
It is also representative of the kind of service
offered MTM by many tailors and shops in London and New York, and therefore an
everyday alternative for many making the decision over where to have their
shirts made.
As with most Italian MTM operations, there
is a big range of choices in collar and cuff. I went for a spread collar with a
large tie gap. That tie gap led to a greater arch of the tie than either Burgos
or Satriano, though it was also aided by a stiffer interlining. If I were to
order again I would reduce this; it was noticeably stiff in the conically
shaped cuff.
The fit was impressively good for MTM.
Little things were off like the balance of front to back, but MTM is never
going to be able to correct this. It deserved comparison with both Burgos and
Satriano on fit, even though both had direct contact with me and at least two
goes at getting it right. That speaks well of Segun, rather than the Italian
manufacturer he uses.
With regards to make, the following things
were done by hand: the buttons, the buttonholes and the sleevehead (although
you can see from the picture that the latter is coming a little loose already).
Less than the other two reviewed shirts, therefore, though it was made well
overall.
Distinctive aspects of the make are the
pleating across the back, which Segun specifically requests and describes as
his signature; the red gusset reinforcement; and the red stop-tack by the
bottom button. The collar band, though not shown, is wide but narrows
conventionally towards the front.
Overall, a very good made-to-measure shirt,
if a little expensive. I would change the weight of the collar and cuff lining,
as well as the cuff style, in another order. And always go for bespoke if it
was easy, as it will be now with Satriano.
Ratings:
Cut: 8
Make: 7
Style: 8
Finishing: 8
See the introductory piece with links to other shirt reviews here.
Make: 7
Style: 8
Finishing: 8
See the introductory piece with links to other shirt reviews here.












Great read! any reason for going placket-less with all 3? Is it considered more formal?
ReplyDeletethanks!
It is a little more formal, yes, though the difference is not great
DeleteSimon,
ReplyDeleteI enjoy reading your blog. Do you own any shirt made by Charvet in Paris? if you do, could you be kind enough to review it as well. I am looking forward having some bespoke shirts made for me.
Thanks
Andie
Simon,
ReplyDeleteAlso I will like you to review Turnbull & Asser shirt, I am also looking forward to using them.
Do you know if Satriano uses sea island cotton for its shirts.
Thanks
Andie
I have written a lot about T&A Andie, have a search of the blog
DeleteIs your preference for fused collars and cuffs? I always feel unfused interlinings are more in keeping with the character of hand made suits, but this line of thinking maybe based more in emotion than reason or simply be a consequence of having grown used to English shirts. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this matter.
ReplyDeleteMany thanks.
I have come to prefer light fusing
DeleteWhy is that?
Deletegive the guy a chance .. how is he supposed to review every shirt maker there is ..
ReplyDeleteThose cuffs seem the biggest of all three. How tall are they?
ReplyDeleteYes they are very tall. Too tall for me
DeleteGreat post. Do you have any experience with Emma Willis shirts ?
ReplyDeleteYes I have a couple. They're pretty much interchangeable with T&A
DeleteVery much enjoy your posts -- many thanks! I have a question regarding this shirt: it appears that there is a vertical seam in the yoke (last photo). Is this a seam? If so, what is its function? It doesn"t appear to be centered on the yoke -- is there another seam to match on the right side?
ReplyDeleteThank you!
CSBaker
Yes there is a seam. I don't think it makes much difference whether there is a seam in the yoke or not.
DeleteIt is in the centre, the shirt is just slightly askew on the mannequin
I prefer split yokes with the fabric angling downward towards the sleeves. Apart from better pattern matching with sleeves in case of striped or checked shirts, such yokes allow more arm movement in shirts with closer fits because fabrics stretch more diagonally than length or width wise. Try this on a swatch.
DeleteI'm aware of the difference in stretch but I've never noticed much practical difference
DeleteHi Simon,
ReplyDeleteTwo questions; firstly, I understand these are 'placket-less'. I always thought that that meant that the buttons were hidden completely under an extra layer of fabric, like on some black tie shirts. Obviously I was wrong; could you please explain the difference between placketed and placket-less shirts?
Also, why do you prefer light fusing for the collar and cuffs? I was always under the impression that a high-end shirt is supposed to have no fusing whatsoever, and that fusing is the marker of a lower-end shirt.
Thanks.
Placket-less means without an extra layer of material for the buttons - the front is just folded back.
DeleteThe construction you are thinking of is a fly front
And fusing is cheaper, so it is used on low-end shirts, but done well it is also lighter and produces a cleaner finish. The lightness leads to a collar that rolls out of the collar rather than sliding underneath it
Delete