I’m asked fairly regularly by female
readers about starting a version of Permanent Style for women, but in my
experience there just isn’t enough out there of interest – that’s well-made,
classically styled and not too middle-aged. They also ask if I know of any good
sites – so if you do, please let me know in the comments to this post.
Several of the bespoke tailors do make
clothes for women, but they are mostly women’s versions of male styles, with
the same proportions and priorities. Then there are tailors such as Edward
Sexton, who make fabulous creations but generally to their own, refined
aesthetic.
Kathryn Sargent, who made me my fantastic travel blazer while she was at Gieves & Hawkes, has quietly been making
suits for high-powered female clients for quite a while. Perhaps they were
attracted by Kathryn being the first-ever female head cutter on the Row, but they seem also to have become regulars.
I was interested in exploring the differences in
women’s tailoring, therefore, when my wife decided to have a bespoke jacket made by Kathryn. The
images here are from the first fitting.
As my wife rarely needs to or opts to dress
smartly, we needed to make something that would be fairly casual, yet perhaps
could be dressed up with grey flannels if so desired. We went therefore for a green
herringbone tweed from the Sherrytweed bunch – the same from which Steven Hitchcock made me a jacket last year.
Kathryn’s tailoring for women is very
flexible and adapted to the individual. There are far less presumptions than
with male tailoring. A business suit for a female director might therefore more
closely mirror the proportions of male colleagues, but a casual jacket like
this one, for a relatively young client, is often more contemporary. She has
her own book of sketched designs to illustrate the various options.
Most noticeable is that the length is much
shorter than a classic male suit. It tends to be with women anyway, partially
because the waist is that much higher, but it is also necessary to make slightly
greater concessions to fashion. The back of the jacket at this fitting was also
slightly shorter than the front, so the effect is exaggerated; it will be lengthened.
Another interesting thing about small,
short jackets is that the space for pockets is much reduced. If regular pockets
were included the front would be very cramped. Kathryn normally goes without an
outbreast pocket, therefore, and with something this small rarely uses patch
pockets. (The chalk marking above is to illustrate the room it would take up.)
Kathryn’s branding is in burgundy, and she
uses this for the melton under the collars as standard. We picked a Liberty
shirting for the lining of the body that echoes the green of the cloth and that
deep red. The sleeve lining is a red butcher’s stripe.
Kathryn's US dates:
New York
18th, 19th, and 20th February – The London Hotel, 151 W.54th Street
Chicago
22nd and 23rd February – The Waldorf Astoria, 11 East Walton
San Francisco
25th February – Clift Hotel, 495 Geary Street
Contact: Kathryn@KathrynSargent.com
Pictures: Luke Carby
















Hi Simon,
ReplyDeleteGreat post and that jacket looks very flattering.
Does G&H bespoke have a house style? Is it similar to Huntsman? As a result of their mass-consumption RTW range, their bespoke is not as widely talked about on blogs despite having the highest Row share.
Thanks
G&H doesn't, no, but that's something new cutter Davide Taub has been working on. The new cuts looks beautiful - Davide is a real innovator and fantastically talented. Generally it's traditional English military, but not as pronounced as Huntsman. More like Poole. Have a look at the Rake piece I link to on my travel blazer to get an idea.
DeleteAnd G&H doesn't have the largest share of revenue on the Row. It's Henry Poole or A&S, depending on whether you count the latter as being on the Row. They do have a very large department though, and you're right in saying this doesn't get talked about much.
Hmmm...the sleeves don't look too good in all honesty. Am I correct to assume this will be fixed later on?
ReplyDeleteRegards,
Tom
If you're referring to the pitch, then yes this will be changed a lot. It's only a basted fitting.
Delete"As my wife rarely needs to or opts to dress smartly"
ReplyDeleteYou should take her out more often then!
Also I'm sure she would have preferred some jewellery
How ridiculously presumptuous.
DeleteI would love to go through the process of having a jacket made! or better still to be a student of Kathryns. Thank-you so much for the post.
ReplyDeleteAllison